Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13323 (KAR)

SMT SATHAYA MUNE GOWDA v. THE SPECIAL THASILDAR

WP/6143/2026 · 2026-03-23

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16611 WP No. 6143 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 6143 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT SATHYA MUNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS D/O LATE. SRI. M.V. KRISHNAPPA, R/AT SAVASA APARTMENTS, APT. 9D TOWER II, 13, MATA SHARADA DEVI ROAD, OPP. BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU- 560019 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND: THE SPECIAL THASILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-560064 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHESHU V.S., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO EFFECT KHATHA IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY. NO.7, MEASURING 5 ACRES SITUATED Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16611 WP No. 6143 of 2026 AT MANCHENAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21.07.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-C. AND (B) ISSUE ANY SUCH OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT/ORDER/DIRECTION AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On the previous date of hearing, the following order was passed, which reads as follows: ‘Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice of the respondent-Special Tahsildar, Yelahanka Taluk. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve copies of the petition along with annexures on the learned Additional Government Advocate. Since it is the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner's application for mutation in the revenue records pursuant to the registered release deed dated 15.09.2017 has not been considered by - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16611 WP No. 6143 of 2026 the respondent-Tahsildar, learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to secure instructions and make submissions. Re-list this matter on 23.03.2026 for preliminary hearing.’ 2. Today, the learned Additional Government Advocate submits on instructions that J-slip was generated and forwarded to the office of the Tahsildar only in respect of the Power of Attorney which was registered along with the release deed dated 15.09.2017. However, it is also submitted that J-slip regarding the release deed dated 15.09.2017 is also forwarded from the office of the jurisdictional Sub-Registrar to the office of the Tahsildar last week. 3. If that is the admitted position, the respondent- Special Tahsildar, Yelahanka Taluk, is required to proceed to pass mutation orders and enter the name of the petitioner in accordance with the release deed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16611 WP No. 6143 of 2026 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE SKS