Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12243 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- JOGBANI RAIL P.S. District- Katihar ====================================================== Anzar Ali @ Anjar Ali Son of Islam R/o Village - Bagdhara, Ward no. 08, P.S. - Jokihat, Dist. - Araria, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 10-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 22(a) of NDPS Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that from the bag of this petitioner, 10 packets of PYEEVON SPAS PLUS total 2400 narcotic pills were found.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that each capsules contains tramadol hydrochloride IP 50 mg and total amount of tramadol hydrochloride which has been recovered is 120 grams.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12243 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026 2/2
Learned counsel has submitted that the alleged contraband which is said to be recovered from the possession of this petitioner is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity as per NDPS Act. Police has also submitted that charge sheet under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.10.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Jogbani P.S. Case No. 12 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Katihar.
shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T