1 2026:CGHC:8027-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2670 of 2024 1 - Sunil @ Vikki Patil S/o Subhash Patil Aged About 34 Years (Correct Name Of Petitioner Is Mentioned Vicky Wrongly Added In Chargesheet ) Residents Of Street No. 5 House No 5, Dhuleshwar Nagar Kabnoor Ichalkaranji District - Kolhapur (Maharashtra ) Present Address Jai Gopal Apartment Main Road Near Gandhi Putla Ichalkaranji District - Kolhapur (Maharashtra ) (Accused ) 2 - Lakshmi Patil D/o Subhash Patil Aged About 28 Years Residents Of Street No. 5 House No 5, Dhuleshwar Nagar Kabnoor Ichalkaranji District - Kolhapur (Maharashtra ) ( Present Address Jai Gopal Apartment Main Road Near Gandhi Putla Ichalkaranji District - Kolhapur (Maharashtra ) (Accused ) 3 - Devendra Daglia S/o Late Sohan Lal Daglia Aged About 52 Years Residents Of Street No. 5 House No 5, Dhuleshwar Nagar Kabnoor Ichalkaranji District - Kolhapur (Maharashtra ) 4 - Rekha Daglia W/o Devendra Daglia Aged About 51 Years Residents Of Street No. 5 House No 5, Dhuleshwar Nagar Kabnoor Ichalkaranji District - Kolhapur (Maharashtra ) ( Present Address Jai Gopal Apartment Main Road Near Gandhi Putla Ichalkaranji District - Kolhapur (Maharashtra ) (Accused ) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The S.H.O. Police Station Mahila Thana District - Durg (C.G.) (Prosecution ) ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2026.02.16 11:28:35 +0530 2 2 - Smt. Ankita Dugad W/o Sunil Patil Aged About 33 Years R/o Arya Shukla Building, First Floor, City Kotwali, District - Raipur (C.G.) ( Complainant ) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Aman Upadhyay, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 13.02.2026 1 Heard Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Sourabh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondent No.1 and Mr. Aman Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. 2 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:- “1) quash the FIR bearing No. 15/2023 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Raipur CG. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A, read with 34 of IPC, 2) To quash the consequent Charge Sheet bearing No. 13/2023 dated 17.03.2023, for 3 offence offences under Sections 498A, read with 34 of IPC, 3) To quash and set aside the order dated 09/06/2023 passed by JMFC, Raipur (C.G) whereby cognizance of the offence under Section 498A r/e Sec 34 of IPC has been taken and Criminal Case No. 9900/2023 parties being 'State of C.G. vs. Sunil @ Vicky Patil and others' has been registered. 4) Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 9900/2023 parties being 'State of C.G. vs. Sunil @ Vicky Patil and others' pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, District Durg, CG, in the ends of justice.” 3 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties jointly submit that although the mediation proceedings have failed, the parties have, thereafter, amicably resolved their disputes. It is further submitted that a compromise has been arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No.2, and that petitioner No.1 as well as respondent No.2 have since solemnized marriage with different persons and are residing separately in their respective matrimonial lives. A photocopy of the compromise deed has been filed by respondent No.2 along with the reply affidavit; however, the original compromise deed has not been placed on record. 4 At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh 4 petition, placing on record the original compromise deed for proper consideration by this Court. 5 Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for, to file afresh along with the original compromise deed. 6 Interim order, if any stands vacated. 7 The Registry is directed to return the certified copies of all annexures to learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining photostat copies thereof on record. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu