[2026:RJ-JP:31985] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15328/2026 CNR: RJHC020766752026 | URN: CW / 32629U / 2026 1. Yogesh Kumar S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 108, Roop Nagar-Ii, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Giriraj Vyas S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Vyas, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Vyas Bhawan, Sheopur, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Gayatri Kansotiya W/o Shri Hemant Kumar Mourya, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 55, Shri Kalyan Nagar, Kartarpura, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 4. Raksha Rani Sanadhya W/o Shri Vijay Kumar Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 480-A, Talwandi, Kota-324005 (Rajasthan). 5. Kavita Sharma W/o Shri Harish Sharma, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 1346, A-Sector, Sector R.k. Puram, Kota, Ward No.23, Kota (South) Kota-324005 (Rajasthan. 6. Ritu Singh D/o Shri Banwari Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Bb-14, Tonk Road, Jai Ambe Nagar, Jaipur Opposite, Jaipur Hospital, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 (Rajasthan). 7. Nidhi Poonia W/o Shri Devashish Chaudhary, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 22-23, Kailash Nagar, Near K.v. No.2, Vtc Jhotwara, Police Station, Jhotwara, Jaipur Rajasthan. 8. Dilip Kumar Nimesh S/o Shri Shyamlal Nimesh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Flat No.3 3/71, Gandhi Nagar, Behind N.c.c. Campus, Vtc Jaipur, Po Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur-302015 (Rajasthan). 9. Ladu Ram Kumawat S/o Shri Chhotoo Ram Kumawat, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Khatu Road, Mukam Post Panchar, Via Khachariyawas, District Sikar-332729 (Rajasthan). 10. Hamiduddin Ahmed S/o Shri Shabbir Ahmed, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 23-C, Mushtaq Manzil Waqf Nagar, Power House Main Road, Dadabadi, Kota-324009 (Rajasthan). 11. Sandeep Ray S/o Shri N.c. Ray, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 597, Devi Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur (Rajasthan). [2026:RJ-JP:31985] (2 of 4) [CW-15328/2026] 12. Neetu Gupta W/o Shri Shyam Sundar Jhalani, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 70/217-A, Patel Marg, Agarwal Farm, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 13. Vijay Kumar Meena S/o Shri Batasya Meena, Aged About 41 Years, R/o A-341, Shiksha Vihar, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 14. Jitender Meena S/o Shri Ramphal Meena, Aged About 40 Years, R/o B-114 Gangasagar B Colony, Near Vaishali Nagar Jaipur (Rajasthan) 15. Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Palaram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Baral, Via Shishu, District Sikar (Rajasthan) 16. Pramod Kaler S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Janta Colony, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar District Sikar (Rajasthan). 17. Vikas Kumar Marwal Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal Marwal, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Kaji Wali Dhani, Village Niwana, Tehsil- Chomu, District- Jaipur (Rajasthan) 18. Kalu Ram Yadav Son Of Shri Suwa Lal Yadav, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of 78 B Income Tax Colony-I, Jagatpura Jaipur 19. Ram Chandra Poonia Son Of Shri Manaphool Poonia, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Sulkhania, Tehsil- Ratangarh, District-Churu 20. Rohit Kumar Son Of Shri Ram Niwas, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Azad Nagar, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 21. Kamlesh Kumae Khedar Son Of Shri Bodun Ram Khedar, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Hanumatoura, Amarsar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Its Additional Chief Secretary To Government, Technical Education Department, Main Building, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, (Rajasthan)- 303005. 2. The Secretary To Government, Department Of Personal, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)- 303005. [2026:RJ-JP:31985] (3 of 4) [CW-15328/2026] 3. The Principal Secretary To Government, Department Of Finance, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)-303005. 4. The Director, Technical Education, Directorate Jodhpur, W-6, Residency Road, Gaurav Path, Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners could not refute that the petitioners would be covered under the definition of ‘government servant’, as prescribed under Section 2(c) of Rajasthan Civil Services (Service Matters Appellate Tribunals) Act 1976 (for short “Act of 1976”), nor could the learned counsel for the petitioner refute that the lis in question also falls under the ‘service matters’, as defined under Section 2(f) of the Act of 1976. In view thereof, since the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy available in law, the learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to approach the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal (for short “RAT”) for redressal of his grievance. Considering the oral prayer, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to approach the RAT for redressal of his grievance. If the petitioners files appropriate petition before the RAT within a period of 30 days, the [2026:RJ-JP:31985] (4 of 4) [CW-15328/2026] RAT shall adjudicate the same on merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one months. Needless to say, no prejudice to be caused to the petitioners based on any observations made hereinabove. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforementioned liberty being granted. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J 37/Prateek