Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13312 (JHR)

CHAMCHATA MURMU @ TALU MURMU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3871/2026 · 2026-05-07

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:13741 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A.No. 3871 of 2026 ------ Chamchata Murmu @ Talu Murmu, aged about 40 years, s/o Manjhi Murmu, r/o Ranjhan, PO +PS Borio Dist Sahibganj …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... Opp. Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Sahu , Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Adl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 07-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. No. 361 of 2025 arising out of Borio PS Case No. 72 of 2025 instituted under Section 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1), 126(2), 351(2), 352 of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner had attacked Manjli Marandi with an axe causing injury to her. It is then submitted that genesis of occurrence is a petty dispute between the family members. It is next submitted that injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. It is further submitted that petitioner had no intention to kill the victim. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner has been in custody since 18.10.2025, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in para 15 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like ( 2026:JHHC:13741 ) 2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj in connection with Borio P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 (S.T. No. 361 of 2025) with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anjali/