Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Megha 14_WP_9397_2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9397 OF 2004 Udharam Ammumal Parwani ...Petitioner V/s. Union of India through the General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai and Ors. ...Respondents ________________ Mr. Hitesh P. Vyas with Mr. Rasik Raut for the Petitioner. Mr. R.V. Govilkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. T.J. Pandian, Mr. R.P. Ojha, Mr. T.C. Subramanian, Mr. Gautam Modanwal, Ms. Vaishali Barot. Ms. Noorjahan Khan and Ms. Aarti Gupta for the Respondents. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 30 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C.: 1) By this Petition, Petitioner has challenged order dated 8/ 12/19 October 2004 passed by City Civil Court dismissing Misc. Appeal No.210 of 2001. The Appeal was preferred by the Petitioner challenging order dated 4 September 2000 passed by the Estate Officer ascertaining the rent in respect of the suit premises at Rs.79,00,375/- for a period upto April-1998. Page No.
1 of
2 30 September 2026 2026:BHC-AS:39985
Megha 14_WP_9397_2004 2) Today, by a separate order passed in Writ Petition No.8065 of 2004, this Court has already directed that entire deposited amount withdrawn by the Railway Administration shall meet its claim towards rent of the premises upto October-2026. The Petitioner is directed to vacate the premises within a period of six weeks. In that view of the matter, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present Petition. Accordingly, the impugend order passed by the City Civil Court shall stand modified with an arrangement directed while disposing of Writ Petition No.8065 of 2004. 3) Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. Rule is made partly absolute. There shall be no order as to costs.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No.
2 of
2 30 September 2026 Signed by: Megha S. Parab Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 01/10/2026 15:09:11