Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010057972026 2026:GAU-AS:4069 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./830/2026 PRANGON BORA ALIAS PRANGON BORAH S/O- KAMAL BORA, R/O- H. NO. 175, HILL TOWN ROAD, KAILASHPUR PATH, HENGARBARI, P.S.- DISPUR, DIST- KAMRUP M, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR KUTUB ALI, MR M RAHMAN,MD S ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 20-03-2026 Heard Mr. S. Ali, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State respondent. Page No.# 2/3 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with prayer for bail as the petitioner is behind bars since 09.03.2026 in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 134/2026 u/s 69 of BNS, 2023. 3. It is submitted by Mr. Ali, the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present accused/petitioner and the victim had a love relationship for a long term and they were also in living relationship. But, thereafter he came to know that she is having affair with another person and thereafter some dispute arose between them. But, the petitioner still love the informant/victim and he submitted that the accused got arrested in connection with this case on 09.03.2026 and thus the I/O got sufficient opportunity to interrogate him keeping him in custody. However, he is ready and willing to extend his cooperation in further investigation of this case, if he is granted with the privilege of regular bail. 4. Mr. Borthakur, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted in this regard that from the ground of arrest it is seen that the victim and the petitioner were in love relationship since 2021 to 2025 and thereafter due to some dispute the FIR has been lodged. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides and the circumstances of this case, I find that further custodial interrogation may not be necessary for the purpose of interrogation. In view of this, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to go on regular bail and hereby his petition is allowed. 6. Accordingly, the accused/petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) only with one surety of like amount to Page No.# 3/3 the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (M). The accused/petitioner, namely Prangon Bora @ Prangon Borah, be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himslf available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (M) without prior permission. The Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant