( 2026:JHHC:14838 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4079 of 2026 ------ Dhanraj Kumar Tiwari @ Dhanraj Ku. Tiwari, aged about 29 years, son of Banke Tiwari, resident of Shivpuri Balidih, P.O. & P.S.-Balidih, Dist.-Bokaro … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kr. Chakraverty, Advocate For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 14.05.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.178 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 191(2)/ 191(3)/ 190/ 127(1)/ 115(2)/ 351(2)/352/117(2)/324(4)/3(5)/109/118(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder the brother of the informant namely Akash Kumar causing injury on his head. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the allegation of causing injury upon the brother of the informant is against Sanjay Tiwari and Ajay Tiwari and assaulting upon the father of the informant is upon Sanjay Tiwari, Ajay Tiwari, Pappu Tiwari, Bhola Tiwari and Banke Tiwari. It is next submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.03.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro, in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.178 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 14.05.2026 Gunjan-