RAM KARAN AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/21953/2026 · 2026-10-04
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13306 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13306 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21953 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 04.07.2026 lodged in Case Crime No. 208 of 2026, Under Sections 110, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 191(2) of BNS, Police Station-Chandwak, District-Jaunpur by the respondent no.3. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of. mandamus commanding and directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 04.07.2026 lodged in Case Crime No. 208 of 2026, Under Sections 110, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 191(2) of BNS, Police Station-Chandwak, District-Jaunpur by the respondent no.3 and no coercive steps be taken against the petitioners by the concerned police."
2. Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners to address the Court, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
3. Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. for the State submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of investigation, charge- sheet has already been forwarded on 17.07.2026 to the court concerned.
4. We have perused the contents made in the F.I.R. and also the averments made in the writ petition.
5. After plain reading of the F.I.R., prima-facie, we are of the opinion Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awashesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ram Karan And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
that commission of cognizable offence is made out against the petitioners.
6. Taking into consideration the non-appearance of learned counsel for the petitioners, submissions advanced by learned A.G.A. for the State and perusal of F.I.R. indicates the commission of cognizable offence against the petitioners, we are not inclined to invoke extra- ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the impugned first information report.
7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 5, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 21953 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad