Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13305 (CHH)

JOAN TOPPO v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

WPC/2134/2023 · 2026-04-26

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19304 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2134 of 2023 1 - Joan Toppo Son Of Shr I Ijido Toppo Aged About 48 Years Resident Of Village- Kersai, Thana- Tapkara, Tahsil- Farsabahar, District- Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector, District-Jashpur ( Chhattisgarh ). 3 - The Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue), Farsabahar, District- Jashpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Executive Engineer, Public Works Division, Jashpur, District- Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Utkarsh Shrivas, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Amit Nayak, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 27/04/2026 RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records pertaining to case of petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issued an appropriate writ, thereby directing the respondent authorities to acquire the land of petitioner in accordance with provisions of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and pay fair & adequate compensation to the petitioner, with interest from the date of use of land to its actual payment. 10.3 To kindly grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat