Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13305 (CAL)

TUSHAR KANTI GHOSH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/4964/2026 · 2026-03-17

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14 1177..0033..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 4964 of 2026 Sri Tushar Kanti Ghosh Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Animesh Paul Ms. Krity Keshri Ms. Manisha Upadhyay …for the petitioner Md. Manuwar Ali Mr. Varun Raj Tiwari …for the State Mr. Angsuman Chakraborty Mr. S.S. Saha …for the respondent no. 6 Mr. Samiddha Sankar Sengupta …for the respondent no. 5 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. By instituting this writ petition, inter alia, petitioner has prayed for registration of FIR by the concerned police authorities. 3. It was succinctly decided by Hon’ble Supreme Court as reported in (2007) 6 SCC 171 (Aleque Padamsee and Others vs. Union of India & Others) that for registering FIR writ petition is not maintainable. If steps are not being taken based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, petitioner shall have remedy 2 under Section 175 as well as Sections 210 and 223 of BNSS before the jurisdictional Magistrate. 4. Hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere with this writ petition. 5. Writ petition stands dismissed. 6. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)