Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13302 (PAT)

Ramanand Prasad Jaisawal v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/4461/2026 · 2026-04-15

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4461 of 2026 ====================================================== Ramanand Prasad Jaisawal Son of Late Jagdish Bhagat, Resident of Bihariganj, P.S.-Bihariganj, District-Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Purnea. 3. The Additional Collector, Purnea. 4. The Sub Divisional Police Objection Redressal Officer, Dhamdaha, District- Purnea. 5. The Anchaladhikari, Barhara Kothi Anchal, District-Purnea. 6. The Halka Karmchari, Barhara Kothi Anchal, District-Purnea. 7. The Anchal Inspector, Barhara Kothi Anchal, District-Purnea. 8. The Anchal Amin, Barhara Kothi Anchal, District-Purnea. 9. Yogendra Rai, son of Late Maheshar Rai, Resident of Village-Sahsaul, P.S.- Barhara Kothi, District-Purnea. 10. Md. Naza Mian @ Nazmul Hoda, Son of Abdul Latif, Resident of Village- Sahsaul, P.S.-Barhara Kothi, District-Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Government Pleader (19) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 15-04-2026 Heard Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the concerned respondents to rectify/correct the Jamabandi number 296 of 2.982½ acre of the land of the Patna High Court CWJC No.4461 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026 2/3 petitioner appertaining to khata No. 296, khesra No. 65 of Mauja Sasaul in which land was purchased by the father of the petitioner vide registered deed and got his land mutated in his favour and Jamabandi number was created in his name but the respondent No. 9 in collusion with some Anchal staffs got receipts issued in his favour for the land of the petitioner measuring an area of 1.20 ½ decimal of the aforesaid khata and khesra again for which the petitioner filed objection before the concerned authorities including Sub-Divisional Public Objection Redressal officer Dhamdaha, Anchaladhikari Dhamdaha and accordingly Jamabandi cancellation Case No.1/2019-20 / 42/2019-20 was drawn up by the Additional Collector, Purnea who after receipt of the report from the Anchaladhikari, Dhamdaha and after filing of the pleading by the petitioner and others has kept the matter pending without any reason which shows his biasness against the petitioner and thus this Hon'ble court should the concerned Patna High Court CWJC No.4461 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026 3/3 authorities including the Additional Collector, Purnea to decide the case in accordance with law so that the right and interest of the petitioner to possession his ancestral land may be protected and the petitioner may not be dispossessed from his land by land grabbers.” 3. In the presence of learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner is no more and as such, family be granted liberty to approach the respondent no.3, the Additional Collector, Purnea for redressal of the grievance. 4. This Court has taken note of the Jamabandi Cancellation Case No. 1/2019-20 / 42/2019-20 (State vs. Ramanand Prasad and Ors.) which is pending before the concerned respondent, the Additional Collector, Purnea. 5. It is expected that if the same has not been disposed of, shall be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest. 6. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U