- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22527 WP No. 19354 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19354 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI HANUMA BHOVI S/O.LATE KALA BHAOVI AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT AGRAHARA VILLAGE, DODDAMAGGE HOBLI, ARAKALAGUDU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANIKANTA H B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN-573201. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ARAKALAUGUDU TALUK, ARAKALAGUDU, HASSAN DISTRICT-573102. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22527 WP No. 19354 of 2025 4. THE TAHASILDAR ARAKALAGUDU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573102. 5. SRI. ANDANI SHETTY, S/O LATE NINGANASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 6. SRI VIJAYENDRA S/O LATE NINGANASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 7. SRI GOVINDEGOWDA S/O SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 8. SMT NAGAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 9. SRI RAJEGOWDA S/O SANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 10. SRI N S PRADEEP S/O SANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 10 ARE R/AT AGRAHARA VILLAGE, DODDAMAGGE HOBLI, ARAKALAHUDU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22527 WP No. 19354 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.12.2024 IN REVISION PETITION NO.127/2023-24 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 10.04.2026, the following order was passed: “Finally, two weeks' time is granted for compliance of office objections. If office objections are not complied, list this matter for dismissal on 24.04.2026.” 2. Till today, office objections have not been complied with. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL