RITESH KUMAR S/O LATE SHRI RAMESH PRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15774/2025 · 2026-08-20
Anuroop Singhi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13301 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13301 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:33626] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15774/2025 CNR: RJHC020892802025 | URN: CW / 35889U / 2025 Ritesh Kumar S/o Late Shri Ramesh Prakash, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Saraswati Sadan, Bilada, Jodhpur-342602. (Employee Id- Rjjo201725014007) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Behind Nehru Palace, Lal Kothi, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy.GC with Mr. Munendra Singh Fouzdar Ms. Yashvi Khandelwal with Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 20/08/2026
1. Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with the liberty to raise all his objections, both on law and facts, including with respect to the scope of Rule 35 of the Rajasthan Police Service Rules, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1954'), by filing a detailed reply to the impugned notices before the competent authority.
[2026:RJ-JP:33626] (2 of 2) [CW-15774/2025]
2. Considering the limited submission so made and without delving into the merits of the matter, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise all possible objections both on law and facts, including the one with respect to the scope of the Rule 35 of the Rules of 1954, before the competent authority, who would duly consider the same strictly in accordance with law.
3. Pending application(s), if any, stand dismissed.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J 16/DIPESH CHAYAL