Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 133 (JK)

M/S SATYA PAUL SHARMA AND SONS TH SUDESH SHARMA v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/57/2026 · 2026-01-19

Rajesh Sekhri

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 57/2026 M/S Satya Paul Sharma and Sons. ….Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. M.K Bharadwaj, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gagan Kohli, Advocate. V/s UT of J&K & Ors. ….Respondent(s) Through :- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER (19.01.2026) 01. After detailed submissions, Mr. M.K Bharadwaj, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that it shall be suffice if respondents are directed to treat the present petition as a representation and accord consideration to the same as per the reliefs sought within a timeframe. His statement is taken on record. 02. In view of the statement made by learned senior counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat the present writ petition as a representation and accord consideration to the same as per the reliefs sought in the present writ petition within a period of four weeks from the date copy of this order, along with copy of writ petition and annexures, is made available to them. 03. Disposed of along with connected application(s). (Rajesh Sekhri) Judge JAMMU 19.01.2026 Abinash Sr. No. 32