Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13299 (JHR)

ROHIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OFJHARKHAND

B.A./3890/2026 · 2026-05-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:14225] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3890 of 2026 ------ Rohit Kumar, aged about 25 years, son of Raghunandan Mahto, Resident of Krishnapuri, P.O. & P.S. – Chutia, Dist.- Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Anand, Advocate Mr. Nilesh Kr. Gupta, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-11-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 771 of 2025 arising out of Chutia P.S. Case No. 282 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 112 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner files the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of aluminium wire of the transformer. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there is also allegation against the petitioner that the petitioner is a habitual offender and he is involved in sale and purchase of stolen articles. It is also submitted that though charge has been framed against the petitioner but no witness has been examined in this case as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.08.2025 as is evident from para-13 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVII, Ranchi in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 771 of 2025 arising out of Chutia P.S. Case No. 282 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 11.05.2026 Saroj/