- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20864 CRL.RP No. 352 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 352 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MR. NADAF SAHEBLAL S/O MOULA SAB, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/A NO.16/1, ANNAPURNESHWARI NILAYA, 14TH CROSS, 20TH 'D' MAIN, MARUTHI NAGARA, BTM 1ST STAGE MADIWALA, BANGALORE - 560 068. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKSHATHA SHETTY K, ADVOCATE) AND: MR. PRASANNA P. HEGDE S/O PUNUSHOTTAM N. HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/A NO.92/3, 3RD MAIN, PUTTENAHALLI, BANK OF BARODA COLONY, J.P. NAGAR 7TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.G. BHAT, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF CONVICTION IN JUDGMENT DATED 06.02.2019 PASSED BY THE XVI ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.4753/2016 AND Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20864 CRL.RP No. 352 of 2023 JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE LV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-56) IN CRL.A.NO.781/2019 DATED 17.12.2022. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. After addressing the arguments for some time, joint memo is filed by both the parties. Memo reads as under: “That the undersigned counsel for the petitioner submits as follows: That the petitioner has paid an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the respondent and agreed to clear the balance amount of Rs.3,00,000/- in three equal installments. a. Rs.1,00,000/- in the month of June. b. Rs.1,00,000/- in the month of July. c. Rs.1,00,000/- in the month of August. That the respondent has agreed to receive the amount in the months mentioned in the memo. Wherefore, it is respectfully prayed before the Hon’ble Court to dispose the above matter in terms of the memo, in the interest of justice.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20864 CRL.RP No. 352 of 2023 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed no objection the said memo. 3. Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that if the compensation amount as agreed in the memo is not paid by the revision petitioner, imprisonment ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court stands restored automatically. SD/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 27