Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13295 (KAR)

SRI SATHISH KUMAR JADHAV v. SRI RAJAKUMAR

CRL.RP/14/2023 · 2026-03-24

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16744 CRL.RP No. 14 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 14 OF 2023 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI. SATHISH KUMAR JADHAV S/O SRI. NARAYAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O NO. 636, 2ND FLOOR, 12TH CROSS, M.C.E.C.H.C LAYOUT PHASE 1, DR. SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR BENGALURU - 77 (OLD ADDRESS) PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO. 743, 16TH CROSSS M.C.E.C.H.C LAYOUT PHASE 1, DR. SHIVARAMAKARANTH NAGAR BENGALURU - 77 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJA M, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. RAJAKUMAR S/O M.G. CHADNRASHEKAR RAO AGED 57 YEARS, R/AT NO. 112, OLD NO. 626 VANSHIKA SQUARE, 3RD FLOOR 5TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, BANASHANKARI 1ST STAGE Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16744 CRL.RP No. 14 of 2023 ASHOKNAGAR BENGALURU - 560 050. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. V.R. BALARAJ, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-64) IN CRL.A.NO.104/2020 DATED 01.10.2022 IN CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE LEARNED JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND XXVI ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU (SCH-09) IN C.C.NO.5755/2018 DATED 20.12.2019 AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE ACCUSED / PETITIONER FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. After addressing the arguments for some time, a memo is filed by learned counsel for the revision petitioner and signed by the revision petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed no objection on the joint memo. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16744 CRL.RP No. 14 of 2023 3. Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. 4. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. 5. It is made clear that if the compensation amount as agreed in the joint memo is not paid, revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court. 6. After payment of entire compensation amount, sum of Rs.5,000/- imposed by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court stands set aside. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47