Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13283 (BOM)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER v. MAHAMAD MOHSIN ABDUL LATIF PATEL

IA/1924/2026 · 2026-09-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27-FA(ST)-19865-2017.doc Gayatri IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 19865 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1014 OF 2018 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1922 OF 2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1013 OF 2018 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1924 OF 2026 The State Of Maharashtra Thr. the Special LandAnd Anr. … Appellant V/s. Shri.Mahamad Mohsin Abdul Latif Patel,Deceased Thr.Lrs.Smt.Safiyabibi Mahamad Mohsin Patel And Ors. … Respondents Mr. A. R. Patil, Addl. G.P. for Appellant. Ms. Deepa Punde with Mr. Sachin Punde for Respondent Nos. 1/1, 1/83, 4, 5 & 10. Mr. Gaurav U., i/b S. S. Kulkarni, for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5, 8 & 9. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 P.C.: INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1922 OF 2026 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘b’ and ‘c’. 1 27-FA(ST)-19865-2017.doc 2. Necessary amendment is to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1924 OF 2026 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘b’ and ‘c’. 4. Necessary amendment is to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2