[2026:RJ-JP:31670] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10823/2026 CNR: RJHC020635622026 | URN: CRLMB / 20045U / 2026 Farook S/o Rasid, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Jodhpur, Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg. (At Present In District Jail, Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Non Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, Mr. Amit Shekhawat, Mr. Ravi Yadav For State For complainant : : Mr. Naresh Gupta, P.P. Mr. Arafat Hussain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 12/08/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 04.07.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kama, District Deeg(Rajasthan), in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.924/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.94/2022, Police Station Kaithwara, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 504, 326, 34 of the IPC, 1860. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits there are as many as 7 cases reported to be pending against the petitioner. He submits that the co-accused namely Sabir, Taiyab and Rasid have already been enlarged on bail and even when the injury was attributed to Rasid, he has been granted the benefit of bail. [2026:RJ-JP:31670] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10823/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 14.06.2026 and furthermore, the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any stringent conditions imposed by the Court. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel appearing for the complainant vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; all the offences are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; other co-accused namely Sabir, Taiyab and Rasid have already been enlarged on bail; the injury has been attributed to Rasid; but considering the fact that there are as many as 7 cases reported to be pending against the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted subject to imposition of stringent conditions. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely- Farook S/o Rasid arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.94/2022, Police Station Kaithwara, District Bharatpur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the [2026:RJ-JP:31670] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10823/2026] satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other case of similar nature in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the Concerned Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Concerned Officer. (vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Concerned Officer as well as the trial Court. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 55/KRATIKA