Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010148302026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1628/2026 ABDUL HASHIM CHOUDHURY AND 7 ORS. S/O LATE ABDUL KADIR CHOUDHURY, R/O VILLAGE DAKSHIN SONAPUR PART-I, P.O. DAKSHIN SONAPUR, P.S. HAILAKANDI, DISTRICT HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-788151. 2: NOHID KOUCHAR MAZUMDER S/O ABDUL MOTIN MAZUMDER R/O BASHDAHAR PT-II P.O. MATIJURI P.S. DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN788151. 3: SAYEED AHMED BARBHUIYA S/O ABDUL HASIM BARBHUIYA R/O BASHDAHAR PT-II P.O. MATIJURI P.S. DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788151. 4: AZIZ MUSTAFA BARBHUIYA @SANNA S/O JAHIR UDDIN BARBHUIYA R/O BASHDAHAR PT-II P.O. MATIJURI P.S. DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788151. 5: TAYABUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY @ DILU S/O LATE HARUN RASHID CHOUDHURY R/O BASHDAHAR PT-II P.O. MATIJURI Page No.# 2/3 P.S. DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN788151. 6: NOOR AHMED BARBHUIYA @ HANIF S/O LATE MAYUR UDDIN BARBHUIYA R/O BASHDAHAR PT-II P.O. MATIJURI P.S. DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788151. 7: MOHIM UDDIN MAZUMDER S/O LATE KALA RAJA MAZUMDER R/O VILLAGE BORHAILAKANDI PART-III P.O. BARHAILAKANDI P.S. HAILAKANDI DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788151. 8: AMIN SADIK BARBHUIYA @ AMIN SADDIQUE BARBHUIYA JIMRAN S/O NURUL ISLAM BARBHUIYA R/O BARHAILAKANDI PT-II P.O. BARHAILAKANDI P.S. DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788151 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H I CHOUDHURY, H YEASMIN,MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 28.08 . 2026 Heard Mr. S. Nawaz, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P for the State of Assam. 2. The Case Diary, as called for, has been received. 3. Although, during the enquiry, an opinion has been expressed that the petitioners may be involved in illegal sand mining, there is no evidence recorded to support the said allegation. 4. Accordingly, at this stage, I am of the considered opinion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners would not be necessary and, therefore, the interim bail granted on the earlier occasion is hereby made absolute. JUDGE Comparing Assistant