1 2026:CGHC:14692 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 305 of 2026 1 - Smt. Purnima Nirmal D/o Late Shyamlal Bareth Aged About 33 Years R/o Sichai Colony, Champa, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir-Champa (Cg) ... Applicant versus 1 - Vikash Nirmal S/o Basant Kumar Nirmal Aged About 35 Years R/o House No. 37, Near Post Office- Sundar Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur (Cg) ... Respondent (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Applicant : Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Anshul Tiwari, Advocate. (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 30/03/2026 1. Heard on I.A. No.01/2026, which is an application for condonation of delay in filing MCC. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, which is well supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and delay of 153 days in filing MCC is hereby condoned. 3. Also heard on MCC. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.03.30 18:26:26 +0530 2 4. This MCC has been filed for restoration of TPC No.99/2025, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 11.08.2025. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to some personal difficulties, he could not appear on the date of hearing. He further submits that the reason for his non-appearance is bona-fide, therefore, this MCC may be allowed and TPC No.99/2025 may be restored to its original number. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 7. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the memo of MCC, which is well supported by an affidavit, the present MCC is allowed and the impugned order dated 11.08.2025 is recalled. Registry is directed to restore TPC No.99/2025 (Smt. Purnima Nirmal vs. Vikash Nirmal) in its original number. 8. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. 9. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar