HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34301 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No. 7 of 278) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Mrs. Ankita Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anit Kumar Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.174 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Vishunpura, District Kushinagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay of more than two days in the institution of F.I.R. and there being general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons including the applicant and also the fact that no overt act has been assigned to the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant- Nagendra, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 5, 2026 Suraj Srivastav Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankita Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Krishan Pahal,J.) Nagendra .....Applicant(s) State Of U..P .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad