( 2026:HHC:24833 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No.440 of 2020 Date of Decision: 24.06.2026 Nand Lal and Anr. …Petitioners Versus Roshni Devi & Ors. …..Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Petitioners in person, with Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) In pursuance of the directions, passed in the order dated 17.06.2026, report of the Local Commissioner has been received. 2. In view of the settlement, which has taken place with the sincere efforts, made by the Local Commissioner, the parties to the lis have jointly stated today about the compromise, which has taken place between them, regarding dispute, involved in the present 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:24833 ) case. The compromise has been placed on record by the parties as Ex.PA ( consisting of 7 pages), which include the rough site plan, prepared by the Local Commissioner. 3. In addition to this, the report of the Local Commissioner, by virtue of which, the settlement has taken place between the parties, has also been relied upon by the parties, as Ex.PB (consisting 6 pages). 4. In view of the above settlement, a prayer has been made to dispose of the present petition, as compromised. 5. In addition to this, it has also been stated by the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents that in view of settlement, having been taken place between them, with the sincere efforts made by the Local Commissioner, now, the respondents will not press their execution petition, pending before the Court of learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, H.P. 6. In view of the said statement, the present petition is accordingly disposed of, being compromised. ( 2026:HHC:24833 ) 7. Parties are bound by the statements, so recorded today, as well as, the statements, which have been made before the Local Commissioner and Exhibited as PA and report of the Local Commissioner as Ex.PB. CMP No.14985 of 2026 8. In view of the said statements, application under Order 23, Rule 3, Sub Rule 3 read with Section 151 of CPC, for recording the compromise between the parties is accordingly disposed of. 9. Before parting with, this Court also places on record its deep appreciation for the pro-bono sincere efforts, put in by Shri Tejasvi Sharma, Advocate, who was appointed as Local Commissioner, in this case. (Virender Singh) Judge June 24, 2026 (subhash)