[2026:RJ-JP:13329] sHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2718/2026 Rohit Prajapati S/o Roopchand Prajapati, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Behind Ek Meenar Ki Masjid Chhawani Police Thana Gumanpura District Kota City Rajasthan. (At present confined at Central Jail Kota) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Applicants(s) : Mr. Rahil Kalam Khan for Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 30/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.47/2026, registered at Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act, dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a young boy, aged about 20 years and that the applicant has been behind bars since 27.01.2026. It is submitted that approximately 6.97 grams of MDMA is recovered from the applicant which is less than the prescribed commercial quantity of [2026:RJ-JP:13329] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2718/2026] 10 grams. It is lastly submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that the applicant is a young boy, aged about 20 years; that the applicant has been in custody since 27.01.2026; that quantity of recovered contraband is less than the prescribed commercial quantity; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused- applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Rohit Prajapati S/o Roopchand Prajapati, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J PARSHANT /87