Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1327 (ALL)

NAGENDRA KUMAR KULSHRESTHA @ NAGENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/10461/2026 · 2026-05-13

Padam Narain Mishra, Rajeev Misra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10461 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. Heard Mr. Akarsh Dwivedi, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for State/respondents-1 and 2. At the very outset, the learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received instructions in present writ petition. On the matter being taken up, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner himself does not wish to press the present writ petition. Ttherefore, the instant writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn. Learned A.G.A. representing State/respondents- 1 and 2 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner. In view of above, the present writ petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. May 14, 2026 Arshad Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akarsh Dwivedi, Varchasva Dwivedi, Yagyadhar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Padam Narain Mishra,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Nagendra Kumar Kulshrestha @ Nagendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARSHAD MAHMOOD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad