HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8682 of 2017 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Counsel for respondents states that as per her instructions the suit itself has been decided in the year 2021 and writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed. 3. However, in case, the suit is still pending, petitioner may move a recall application. October 8, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Bhushan Nigam, Ram Naresh Nigam Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rama Goel Bansal (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mahendra Kumar Mishra And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Arti Premani And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad