Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.11104 of 2026 Suphala Nayak ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. – Mr. Saroj Kumar Routray -versus- State of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties Mr. U.C. Jena, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 20.04.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ petition as well as the documents annexed thereto. 3. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayers:- “It is therefore humbly prayed before this Hon’ble Court that the Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ application and to issue Notice to the Opp. Parties by calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why the prayers made hereunder be not allowed. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus by directing the Opp. Parties to disburse her pending salary if any and safeguard her personal liberty and safety in the school premises. And to pass any other order/orders as deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.” Page 2 of 3. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner wants to make a fresh representation before the authority concerned with a direction from this Court to the authority to consider the case of the Petitioner within a stipulated period of time. 5. Learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties submits that he has no objection if the Petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned with a direction to the authority concerned to consider the representation of the Petitioner in accordance with law and within the stipulated period of time. 6. Considering such submission and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, this Court disposes of the writ petition permitting the Petitioner to make a fresh representation taking therein all the grounds along with the supporting documents before the Opposite Parties No.2 and 3 within a period of two weeks from today and in the event such representation is filed before the Opposite Parties No.2 and 3, the Opposite Parties No.2 and 3 shall do well to consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of such representation. The final decision so taken on such representation shall be communicated to the Petitioner within ten days thereafter. Page 3 of 3. Further, in the event any salary is due and admissible to the Petitioner and the same is outstanding, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to move an application before the Opposite Parties No.2 and 3 for release her salary. In such eventuality, the Opposite Parties No.2 and 3 shall consider such prayer of the Petitioner within four weeks from the date of Petitioner approaches such Opposite Parties. (Aditya Kumar Mohapatra ) Judge Debasis