Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13262 (GAU)

ASHIQUE RABBANI @ RABUL HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

AB/1728/2026 · 2026-08-27

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010154672026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1728/2026 ASHIQUE RABBANI @ RABUL HUSSAIN SON OF KHAIRUL ISLAM, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF PUB- NEKERA HABI, P.O - JAGIBHAKATGAON, P.S - MAYONG, DIST - MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782411 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY P.P ASSAM 2:NASIR UDDIN SON OF LATE ALTAB ALI RESIDENT OF VILL - NEKERAHABI P.S - MAYONG DIST- MORIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K M HASSAN, MR. J A AHMED,MR. A B ACONDA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. M K BROWN BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 28.08.2026 Heard Mr. A.B. Aconda, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State as well as Ms. M.K. Page No.# 2/2 Brown, learned Amicus Curiae. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that it was already recorded in the earlier order dated 18.08.2026, that charge-sheet has been submitted. Since the investigation has culminated in the charge-sheet, there would not be any apprehension of arrest of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner may be arrested on his appearance before the learned Special Judge, Morigaon. The petitioner is yet to receive the summons to appear before the Trial Court. Since there is no apprehension of arrest by the Investigating Authority, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in case of receipt of summons to face the trial. Anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant