Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20343 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2026 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL District- Samastipur ======================================================
1. Anjali Kumari @ Anjali Devi D/o Upendra Ram R/o - Chhautauna Road, P.S - Muffassil, District - Samastipur, Pin - 848101
2. Kavita Devi D/o Upendra Ram R/o - Chhautauna Road, P.S - Muffassil, District - Samastipur, Pin - 848101
3. Hemanti Devi W/o Upendra Ram R/o - Chhautauna Road, P.S - Muffassil, District - Samastipur, Pin - 848101
4. Upendra Ram S/o Late Asharfi Ram R/o - Chhautauna Road, P.S - Muffassil, District - Samastipur, Pin - 848101 ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Piyush Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 08-04-2026 At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks to withdraw the prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner no.2 Kavita Devi submitting that she has been arrested during the pendency of the bail application. 2. In view of the above, the prayer for bail on behalf of petitioner no.2 Kavita Devi stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 4. The petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Samastipur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20343 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/3 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 76, 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. 5. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., petitioner no. 4, Upendra Ram, along with his sons and other family members, misbehaved with the informant and her mother-in- law. It is further alleged that, in an inebriated condition and with an intention to kill, he assaulted the informant’s mother-in-law, causing head injury. She was admitted to Sadar Hospital, where she received six stitches on her head, and was subsequently referred to another doctor for better treatment. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the case. The injury sustained by the informant’s mother-in-law is simple in nature. The petitioners have clean antecedent. 7. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. 8. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the F.I.R. against petitioner nos. 1 and 3, in absence of specific allegation against them, the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20343 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 3/3 surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS. 9. So far as petitioner no.4 is concerned, it has been alleged in the F.I.R. that he along with his sons in an inebriated condition outraged the modesty of the informant and with an intention to kill, assaulted her mother-in-law who had received six stitches on her head which is the vital part of the body, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no.4 Upendra Ram on pre- arrest bail. 10. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 and if it is found that the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 are involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, this
order will automatically lose its force.
11. The bail application stands disposed of.
mantreshwar/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U T