KANAK KUMAR v. LIBERTY GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 2 ORS.
I.A.(Civil)/2979/2026 · 2026-08-27
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13260 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13260 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010181302026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2979/2026 KANAK KUMAR S/O LATE NARAYAN KR. DAS, VILL. BISHNUPUR, P.O. MIRZA, P.S PALASHBARI, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM. VERSUS LIBERTY GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 2 ORS.
3 B, GANAPATI ENCLAVE OPP. BORA SERVICE, G.S. ROAD, ULUBARI, P.O.
GUWAHATI -781007, DIST - KAMRUP M, ASSAM 2:DHIRAJ BAISHYA S/O MARMESWAR BAISHYA VILL. P.O. SARPARA P.S. PALASHBARI-781122 DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM 3:RITU MANI KALITA S/O ANIL KALITA VILL.SONTALA JYOTIPUR P.O. MIRZA ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R AGARWALA, MR ADITYA AGARWALA Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 28.08.2026
Heard Mr. A Agarwala, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 88 days in preferring the connected appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. This Court is of the opinion that going for issuing notice to the respondents would be nothing but sheer waste of time. Therefore, the delay is condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant