Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13258 (JHR)

KAMALA RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/3525/2020 · 2026-05-07

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:13698 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (C) No. 3525 of 2020 ----- Kamala Ray, widow of Late Ramnath Ray, resident of Ghatshila, P.O. & P.S.-Ghatshila, District-East Singhbhum. … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 2. Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.-Sakchi, District-East Singhbhum. 3. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Ghatshila, P.O. & P.S.-Ghatshila, District-East Singhbhum. 4. Circle Officer, Ghatshila, P.O. & P.S.-Ghatshila, District-East Singhbhum. 5. Mrs. Kamala Devi, wife of Raja Ram Ray, resident of Ghatshila, P.O. & P.S.-Ghatshila, District-East Singhbhum. … Respondent(s). CORAM :SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate For the respondent(s) : Mr. Kishore Kr. Singh, Advocate …...... 07/07.05.2026: 1. Heard the parties. 2. After going through the record I find that there is dispute in respect of the mutation of the property. The petitioner claims the entire property by virtue of registered gift deed. The respondent no. 5 opposes the same and submits that the property was purchased by three brothers. One brother died issueless and, thereafter, the petitioner brought the entire land mutated in her favour leaving out respondent no. 5. 3. After hearing the parties, I find that there is a serious disputed question of title in this case. The gift deed needs to be proved and the title has to be established between the parties. 4. Thus, I direct the petitioner including the respondent no. 5 to approach the Civil Court by filing appropriate suit which will be decided on merits without being influenced and prejudiced by the order passed by Revenue authorities. 5. The Revenue authorities after the suit is decided will consider the case of the mutation in terms of the judgment passed in this case. ( 2026:JHHC:13698 ) 2 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 07.05.2026 Rashmi/- Uploaded on:-12.05.2026