Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010019182026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1042/2026 ON THE DEATH OF NALEN GAYARY, HIS LEGAL HEIRS, MONESWARI GOYARY AND ORS. W/O LATE NALEN GAYARY, VILL- SILPOTA, P.O.- KAJALGAON, P.S.- DHALIGAON, DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD), ASSAM 2: CHAMPA BASUMATARY D/O LATE NALEN GAYARY VILL- SILPOTA P.O.- KAJALGAON P.S.- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM 3: RAMBHA GOYARY D/O LATE NALEN GAYARY VILL- SILPOTA P.O.- KAJALGAON P.S.- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM 4: RAJIB GOYARY S/O LATE NALEN GAYARY VILL- SILPOTA P.O.- KAJALGAON P.S.- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM 5: SABITA GOYARY D/O LATE NALEN GAYARY VILL- SILPOTA P.O.- KAJALGAON P.S.- DHALIGAON Page No.# 2/4 DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM 6: SANJIB GOYARY S/O LATE NALEN GAYARY VILL- SILPOTA P.O.- KAJALGAON P.S.- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSA VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF BALEN GAYARI, HIS LEGAL HEIRS ANANSI NARZARY AND ORS. W/O LATE BALEN GAYARI, R/O VILL- SILPOTA, P.O.- KAJALGAON, PIN- 783385, P.S.- DHALIGAON, DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD), ASSAM 2:AMAR SING NARZARY S/O LATE BALEN GAYARI R/O VILL- SILPOTA P.O.- KAJALGAON PIN-783385 P.S.- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM 3:RAM SING NARZARY S/O LATE BALEN GAYARI R/O VILL- SILPOTA P.O.- KAJALGAON PIN-783385 P.S.- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM 4:ORGA NARZARY S/O LATE BALEN GAYARI R/O VILL- SILPOTA P.O.- KAJALGAON PIN-783385 P.S.- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM 5:BOLO SING NARZARY S/O LATE BALEN GAYARI R/O VILL- SILPOTA Page No.# 3/4 P.O.- KAJALGAON PIN-783385 P.S.- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM 6:SOMBARI NARZARY D/O LATE BALEN GAYARI R/O VILL- SILPOTA P.O.- KAJALGAON PIN-783385 P.S.- DHALIGAON DIST- CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M H AHMED, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A SATTAR, Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 28.08.2026 Heard Mr. M H Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Mr. A Sattar, learned senior counsel representing the respondents. This application has been filed under Order 22 Rule 3(1) of the CPC praying for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased appellant. Mr. Sattar has submitted that he has no objection if the names of the legal heirs of the deceased appellant are substituted in his place. Considering entire aspect of the matter, the prayer is allowed. Names of the legal heirs of the deceased appellants, whose names are mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application, shall be substituted. Their names shall be impleaded in the title page of the memo of appeal. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant