Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 3761 of 2026 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
1. List revised. None present for the petitioner to press this petition. Sri Nimai Das learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State is present.
2. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel informs that registration document clearly discloses that the vehicle in question had been purchased from outside State of Uttar Pradesh. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to any benefit of exemption notification.
3. Since none appears for the petitioner even in the revised call, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. October 5, 2026 Faraz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Pooja Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad