HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35352 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No. 73 out of 278) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Raghvendra Yadav, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first one bail application was rejected by this Court vide order dated 20.05.2026, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.17085 of 2026 respectively. 4. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 08 of 2026, under Sections 70(2), 127(2), 351(3) of BNS, 5g/6 of POCSO Act and 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act, Police Station - Rampura, District - Jalaun, during the pendency of trial. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant could not produce any new ground for pressing the instant bail application; as such, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The instant bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 6. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. October 5, 2026 Suraj Srivastav Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghvendra Yadav, Shanti Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Krishan Pahal,J.) Bhupendra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad