Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13250 (CHH)

DEEPAK BAGHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10164/2019 · 2026-02-04

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6553 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10164 of 2019 1 - Deepak Baghel S/o Shri Chaitram Baghel Aged About 26 Years Constable No. 1779, Aged About 26 Years, R/o New Adarsh Nagar, Gali No. 04, Maharaja Chowk, Behind Sahyog Hospital, Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Radheraman Deshmukh S/o Late Bharat Lal Deshmukh, Constable No. 675, Aged About 25 Years, R/o B/4, Newai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Prashant Kumar Verma S/o Shri V. Verma, Aged About 26 Years Constable No. Rakshit Kendra Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police, Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Additional Superintendent Of Police (City) Durg And Enquiry Officer, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent /State : Shri Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate. KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Date: 2026.02.06 12:14:32 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal , J Order On Board 05/02/2026 1. None appears for the petitioners in two rounds. 2. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, would submit that the charges against the petitioners have not been found proved and they have been exonerated from all the charges. 3. In that view of the matter, it appears that the present Writ Petition has become infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Barve