Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13250 (ALL)

SHAMBHUNATH AND 13 OTHERS v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/19292/2026 · 2026-10-06

Ajay Bhanot, Divesh Chandra Samant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19292 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. After some arguments, Shri Utkarsh Singh, learned Advocate holding brief of Shri Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not wish to press the relief for quashing of the F.I.R. in the writ petition. The relief sought for quashing of the F.I.R. is accordingly declined. Shri Utkarsh Singh, learned Advocate holding brief of Shri Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners recasts his relief and prays that the petitioners may be granted leave to approach the competent court for seeking appropriate remedies available with them under the law. Learned AGA for the State does not have any objection to the aforesaid prayer. The writ petition is disposed of with the observation that it is open to the petitioners to avail other legal remedies available with them under the law. October 7, 2026 Virendra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava, Shaym Dhar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar, G.A., Ram Sewak (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Shambhunath And 13 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad