KAMLESH KUMAR VASHISTHA S/O LATE SUVALAL v. HANSRAJ TANWAR
CW/5395/2025 · 2026-08-14
Sudesh Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13249 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13249 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:32296] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5395/2025 CNR: RJHC020305332025 | URN: CW / 12919U / 2025 Kamlesh Kumar Vashistha S/o Late Suvalal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Madhokabaas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Hansraj Tanwar, Late Phoolchand
2. Mali Devi, W/o Late Phoolchand
3. Smt. Ratan Devi W/o Hansraj, Respondents No. 1 To 3, Resident of Madhokabaas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Suvalal Vashistha, (Since Died During Trial) 4/1. Narendra Kumar, S/o Late Suvalal 4/2. Jagdish Prasad, S/o Late Suvalal 4/3. Brijesh, S/o Late Suvalal 4/4. Sajjan Devi, W/o Late Suvalal 4/5. Gayatri Devi, D/o Late Suvalal 4/6. Sushila Devi, D/o Late Suvalal 4/7. Santosh Devi, D/o Late Suvalal 4/8. Vimlesh W/o Late Omprakash, S/o Late Suvalal 4/9. Swati D/o Late Omprakash, S/o Late Suvalal 4/10. Aditya S/o Late Omprakash, Late Suvalal 4/11. Lalita Devi W/o Late Dharmendra, S/o Late Suvalal 4/12.
5. Priyanshi D/o Late Dharmendra S/o Late Suvalal, Since Minor, Through Natural Guardian Mother Lalita Devi. Respondents No. 4/1 To 4/12, R/o Madhokabaas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) Sriram Vashistha S/o Late Suvalal, R/o Madhokabaas, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : None Present
[2026:RJ-JP:32296] (2 of 2) [CW-5395/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 14/08/2026
1. Despite granting an opportunity to file fresh notices of unserved respondents to petitioner vide order dated 22.07.2026, requisite PF and notices have not been filed.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner.
3. It appears that petitioner does not want to pursue this writ petition.
4. In such view, the writ petition is dismissed in default and for want of prosecution.
5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J 24/NITIN