HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 499 of 2026 Court No. - 91 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in court by learned counsel for the appellants is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Vijaya Shankar Shukla, learned counsel for the appellants, Shri Sunil Kumar Tiwari, Advocate and Shri Vijay Kumar Mishra, Advocate appearing on behalf of O.P. No.2 and learned AGA for the State. 3. The present criminal appeal has been filed by the appellants with a prayer to set aside the charge sheet dated 31.05.2025 and cognizance order dated 21.07.2025 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bareilly in Special Trial No.1896 of 2025 (State vs. Satendra and others), arising out of Case Crime No.74 of 2025, under Sections 74, 191(2), 115(2) and 352 BNS and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, P.S.- Visharatganj, District- Bareilly. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants states that he has also filed a criminal case against the opposite party's side. 5. After some argument in the matter, learned counsel for the appellants submits that he does not want to press the prayer for setting aside the charge sheet dated 31.05.2025 and cognizance order dated 21.07.2025. Learned counsel for the appellants further undertakes that the appellants will appear before the court concerned and shall move bail Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ramesh Kumar Dwivedi, Vijaya Shankar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Sunil Kumar Tiwari, Vijay Kumar Mishra Satendra And 9 Others .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) application before the court concerned, within a period of two weeks from today. 6. Learned AGA has no objection to the same. 7. Thus, the charge sheet dated 31.05.2025 and cognizance order dated 21.07.2025 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bareilly in Special Trial No.1896 of 2025 (State vs. Satendra and others), arising out of Case Crime No.74 of 2025, under Sections 74, 191(2), 115(2) and 352 BNS and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, P.S.- Visharatganj, District- Bareilly is, accordingly, rejected. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, the appellants are directed to appear before the court concerned and move bail application, within two weeks from today. It is made clear that no application seeking extension of the aforesaid period shall be entertained by this court. 9. In case, the appellants move bail application before the court concerned, the same shall be considered and decided by the trial court expeditiously and preferably on the same day, in light of principles laid down by the Supreme Court as well as this Court regarding surrender and bail. 10. In case, the appellants fail to appear before the court concerned within the stipulated period, the trial court will be at liberty to adopt appropriate coercive proceedings, in accordance with law, for securing the presence of the appellants. 11. With the aforesaid directions, the appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. 12. Registrar (Compliance) is directed to serve a copy of this order by FAX/e-mail to the court concerned through District & Sessions Judge concerned within 48 hours. October 8, 2026 Ankit. CRLA No. 499 of 2026 2 (Santosh Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANKIT VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad