Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13246 (CHH)

MD. SADDAM ANSARI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1783/2025 · 2026-01-21

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:3809-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1783 of 2025 1 - Md. Saddam Ansari S/o Halim Ansari, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Durga Nagar, Birgaon, Near Birgaon Vidhya Niketan School, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Halim Ansari S/o Abdul Rahup, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Durga Nagar, Birgaon, Near Birgaon Vidhya Niketan School, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O., Police Station Urla, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Saleha Naaz W/o Saddam Ansari, Aged About 20 Years, R/o DMC Talab Para, Ward No. 18, Kumhari, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate. For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Shalendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 22-01-2026 1. Heard Mr. B.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.01.28 18:11:48 +0530 2 heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking the following relief(s):- “1. That, this Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to set aside FIR dated 20/12/2019 in crime no. 579/2019 at the Police station Urla, District Raipur Chhattisgarh u/s 376, 498A, 506B, 323, 34 of IPC and also the charge sheet as (ANNEXURE P1) qua the petitioners, in the interest of justice. 2. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the Order dated 18/05/2020 (ANNEXURE P1) whereby the Ld. Judicial Magistrate First class has taken the cognizance of the case for the offences u/s 376,. 498A, 506B, 323, 34 of the IPC and section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. That the Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to set aside the (ANNEXURE P/2) order dated 08/11/2021 whereby the charges have been framed u/s 498A, 323 and 506 Part II of IPC against the petitioner no. 1 and u/s 498A, 323, 506 part II and 376 of IPC against the petitioner no. 2. 4. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set 3 aside the further proceedings pending against the petitioner in Session trial no. 340/2021 before the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, (FTC), Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5. That any other relief Hon’ble Court deems feet may also be granted.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as evidence of three prosecution witnesses have been recorded before the learned trial Court including the victim, hence, he wants to withdraw the present petition and the petitioners will cooperate with the trial. 4. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil