IMRAN KHAN S/O RASHID KHAN @ RASEED v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12349/2026 · 2026-08-10
Bipin Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13243 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13243 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:31274] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12349/2026 CNR: RJHC020758782026 | URN: CRLMB / 22779U / 2026 Imran Khan S/o Rashid Khan @ Raseed, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Bhaunri, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh with Mr Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order 10/08/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 14.07.2026 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge Kama, District-Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.977/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.166/2026, Police Station-Pahari, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 125, 324(4) & 333 of the BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the offences except offence under Section 333 of the BNS, 2023 are bailable offences.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the challan has been filed and the conclusion of trial will take
[2026:RJ-JP:31274] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12349/2026] sufficiently long time. He also submits that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 03.08.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11356/2026 and the case of the petitioner is on no lesser footing than that of the co-accused. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused-petitioner is in custody since
30.06.2026. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that the challan has been filed; all the offences except an offence under Section 333 of the BNS, 2023 are bailable offences; the petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2026; the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time; the fact that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court; the case of the petitioner is on no lesser footing than that of the co-accused, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely-Imran Khan S/o Rashid Khan @ Raseed arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.166/2026, Police Station-Pahari, District-Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs.
Fifty Thousand
[2026:RJ-JP:31274] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12349/2026] Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/99