Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13239 (PNJ)

HARYANA STATE INDURSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED v. RAMPHAL DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ORS

RFA/1157/2022 · 2026-04-08

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

151 IN TH Haryana Sta Developmen Ramphal (n CORAM: Present: HARKESH that the pre 19.02.2026 which was Developme Infrastructu Versus Gia the instance appeals filed [2] respondent the above fa IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RFA Date na State Industrial and Infrastructure opment Corporation Limited, Panchku Versus hal (now deceased) through LRs and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advoca Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocat for contesting respondent Nos. Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Adv for proforma respondent Nos. 7 **** KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counse e present appeal is squarely cover .2026 passed by this Court in a bunc was RFA No. 530 of 2017, titled pment Corporation (now Harya ructure Development Corporati Gian Chand and others”, whereb stance of appellant-HSIIDC were dis ls filed by the landowners. On the other hand, learne ndent Nos. 1 to 6-landowners is not ove factual position. UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH RFA No. 1157 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.04.2026 cture nchkula ...Appellant s and others ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA dvocate with vocate t Nos. 1 to 6. ty Advocate General, Haryana Nos. 7 & 8. ounsel for the appellant submits covered by the judgment dated bunch of appeals, lead case of itled “Haryana State Industrial aryana State Industrial and ration Limited), Panchkula hereby the appeals preferred at re dismissed, while allowing the earned counsel for contesting not in a position to controvert DINESH KUMAR 2026.04.16 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document          -2-     [3] After going through the judgment passed in Gian Chand’s case (supra) as well as the facts of the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion of the learned counsel for the appellant. [4] Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed in the same terms as Gian Chand’s case (supra). [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed off.  April 08, 2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) ‘dk kamra’ JUDGE            DINESH KUMAR 2026.04.16 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document