HARYANA STATE INDURSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED v. RAMPHAL DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ORS
RFA/1157/2022 · 2026-04-08
Harkesh Manuja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13239 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13239 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
151 IN TH
Haryana Sta Developmen
Ramphal (n
CORAM:
Present:
HARKESH
that the pre 19.02.2026 which was Developme Infrastructu Versus Gia the instance appeals filed [2] respondent the above fa IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
RFA
Date na State Industrial and Infrastructure opment Corporation Limited, Panchku
Versus
hal (now deceased) through LRs and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR
Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advoca
Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate
for the appellant.
Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocat
for contesting respondent Nos.
Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Adv
for proforma respondent Nos. 7 ****
KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, learned counse e present appeal is squarely cover .2026 passed by this Court in a bunc was RFA No. 530 of 2017, titled pment Corporation (now Harya ructure Development Corporati Gian Chand and others”, whereb stance of appellant-HSIIDC were dis ls filed by the landowners. On the other hand, learne ndent Nos. 1 to 6-landowners is not ove factual position.
UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH RFA No. 1157 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.04.2026
cture nchkula
...Appellant s and others
...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA dvocate with
vocate t Nos. 1 to 6. ty Advocate General, Haryana Nos. 7 & 8.
ounsel for the appellant submits covered by the judgment dated bunch of appeals, lead case of itled “Haryana State Industrial aryana State Industrial and ration Limited), Panchkula hereby the appeals preferred at re dismissed, while allowing the earned counsel for contesting not in a position to controvert
DINESH KUMAR 2026.04.16 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
-2- [3] After going through the judgment passed in Gian Chand’s case (supra) as well as the facts of the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion of the learned counsel for the appellant. [4] Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed in the same terms as Gian Chand’s case (supra). [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed off. April 08, 2026
( HARKESH MANUJA ) ‘dk kamra’
JUDGE
DINESH KUMAR 2026.04.16 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document