Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13239 (HP)

SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF HP

CWP/9827/2026 · 2026-06-25

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9803 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Man Singh …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9806 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Aman Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?2 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 2 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9808 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Shashi Kant …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?3 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 3 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9816 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Sanjay Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?4 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 4 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9818 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Viraj Sharma …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?5 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 5 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9819 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Rakesh Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?6 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 6 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9820 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Rajinder Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?7 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 7 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9822 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Karam Singh …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?8 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 8 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9824 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Sumna Kumari …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?9 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 9 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9825 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Avinash Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?10 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 10 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9826 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Hans Raj …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?11 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 11 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9827 of 2026 Decided on: 25.06.2026 Sunil Kumar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?12 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. As prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 25, 2026 (narender) 12 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?