[2026:RJ-JP:33197] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15860/2026 CNR: RJHC020716562026 | URN: CW / 33764U / 2026 Divya Dhawania W/ O Shri Rakesh Marmit, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of 40, Bahubali Nagar, Near Tejaji Temple, Mansarovar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Kalyan Prasad Bairwa Alias K.p. Marmit S/o Kishan Lal Bairwa, Aged About 74 Years, Resident Of 40, Bahubali Nagar, Near Tejaji Temple, Mansarovar, Jaipur Police Station Muhana. 2. Santosh Devi W/o Shri Kalyan Prasad Bairwa Alias K.p.marmit, Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of 40, Bahubali Nagar, Near Tejaji Temple, Mansarovar, Jaipur Police Station Muhana. 3. Rakesh Marmit S/o Shri Kalyan Prasad Bairwa Alias K.p. Marmit, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of 40, Bahubali Nagar, Near Tejaji Temple, Mansarovar, Jaipur . 4. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Jaipur-Second (Sanganer), Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Manju Garg For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 19/08/2026 ;g ;kfpdk ;kph us jktLFkku ekrk&firk vkSj ofj"B ,oa ukxfjdksa dk Hkj.k&iks"k.k ,oa dY;k.k vf/kfu;e 2007 dh /kkjk 5¼1½ ds izko/kkuksa ds izkFkZuk&i= ij ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 06-05-2026 dks pqukSrh nsrs gq, izLrqr dh gS] ftlds }kjk mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ,oa mi[k.M eftLVªsV] t;iqj&f}rh; ¼lkaxkusj½] t;iqj us ;kph ds fo#) fuEu vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS& [2026:RJ-JP:33197] (2 of 3) [CW-15860/2026] v;kphx.k la[;k 01 vkSj 02@izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls is'k ifjokn vkaf'kd Lohdkj dj ;kph@vizkFkhZ la[;k 01 vkSj 02 dks ikcan fd;k tkrk gS fd og v;kphx.k la[;k 01 vkSj 02@izkFkhZx.k ds lkFk nqO;Zogkj] ekjihV] xkyh&xykSt] cnrehth ugha djsa] gSjku ijs'kku ugha djsa] v;kphx.k la[;k 01 vkSj 02@izkFkhZx.k dh fjgk;'k esa jksd&Vksd n[kyankth ugha djsaA fuokl 40 ckgqcyh uxj] rstkth eafnj ds ikl ekuljksoj] t;ijq jktLFkku izkar esa v;kphx.k la[;k 01 vkSj 02@izkFkhZx.k ds 'kkfUriwoZd fjgk;'k esa ck/kk@jksd&Vksd n[kyankth ugha djsa rFkk v;kphx.k la[;k 01 vkSj 02@izkFkhZx.k dks muds LokfeRo ds fuokl esa fuokljr gksus ls csn[ky ugha djsaA ;fn ;kph@vizkFkhZ la[;k 01 vkSj 02] v;kphx.k la[;k 01 vkSj 02@izkFkhZx.k ds fuokl esa n[kyankth@ijs'kku djsa rks Fkkukf/kdkjh iqfyl Fkkuk ekuljksoj t;iqj 30 fnol ds Hkhrj ;kph@vizkFkhZ la[;k 01 vkSj 02 dks v;kphx.k la[;k 01 vkSj 02@izkFkhZx.k ds LokfeRo ds fuokl ls csn[ky fd;k tkdj v;kphx.k la[;k 01 vkSj 02@izkFkhZx.k dks dCtk laHkyok nsosa ,oa ;kph@vizkFkhZ la[;k 01 vkSj 02 ds fo#) fu;ekuqlkj fof/kd dk;Zokgh vey esa ykbZ tkosA ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dguk gS fd ;kph ¼iq=o/kw½ dks vkykSP; vkns'k ds fo#) mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 16 ds izko/kkuksa ds varxZr vihy djus dk vf/kdkj ugha gS] bl dkj.k ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr dh gSA fopkj fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk ek;k nsoh cuke fo'os'oj n;ky vkSj vU;] ,dy ihB flfoy fjV ;kfpdk la[;k 11941@2021 esa fof/k dh fLFkfr] tks fd bl izdkj ds vkns'k ds fo#) vihy ds laca/k esa gS] fuEu izdkj ls Li"V dh xbZ gS& 23. Before parting this order, this Court would like to add that since by various pronouncements by various Hon’ble Courts it has been held that the remedy of an appeal under section 16(1) of the Act of 2007 is available to all the aggrieved persons including the children and relatives. The Addl. Solicitor General of India Mr. R.D. Rastogi, Senior Advocate also stated before the Court that the remedy of an appeal under section 16(1) of the Act of 2007 is available to all the aggrieved persons including the children and [2026:RJ-JP:33197] (3 of 3) [CW-15860/2026] relatives but because of non-mentioning in Section 16 of the Act of 2007 that the children and the relatives could also file an appeal, the confusion remains in legal fraternity and the general public which leads them to invoke the writ jurisdiction against the orders of the Maintenance Tribunal. 24. In view of the observations of the Hon’ble Courts and the statement made by learned Addl. Solicitor General of India, this Court expects from the Union of India to take necessary steps for issuing orders, circulars or amendments in consonance with the observations, findings of the Hon’ble Courts and the statement of Addl. Solicitor General of India in regard to the remedy of filing of an appeal to the children and relatives under the provision of Section 16(1) of the Act of 2007. mDr fu.kZ; ds vuqlkj ;kph dks fnukad 06-05-2026 ds vkns'k ds fo#) ftyk dysDVj ds ;gka vihy djus dk vf/kdkj gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g fjV ;kfpdk lafof/kd vihy dk oSdfYid mipkj miyC/k gksus ds vk/kkj ij fujLr dh tkrh gSA ;kph dks ftyk dysDVj ds le{k vihy izLrqr djus dh mUeqfDr iznku dh tkrh gS vkSj ftyk dysDVj dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;kph }kjk vihy izLrqr fd, tkus ij mldk fuLrkj.k xq.kkoxq.k ij fof/k vuqlkj djsaA rn~uqlkj LFkxu ,oa fofo/k izkFkZuk&i= ;fn dksbZ gksa] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA (SHUBHA MEHTA),J 18/NIMIT GOYAL