Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13237 (ORI)

RITIK PATRA, KHORDHA v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX BHUBANESWAR III CIRCLE, BHUBANESWAR, KHORDHA

WP(C)/10747/2026 · 2026-04-20

Harish Tandon Cj, Murahari Sri Raman

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.10747 of 2026 Ritik Patra … Petitioner Mr. Upendra Narayan Sahoo, Advocate -Versus- Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Bhubaneswar III Circle and another … Opposite Parties Mr. Seshadeb Dash, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No. ORDER 20.04.2026 01. 1. Learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 15th October, 2025 followed by order dated 15th November, 2025 cancelling his client’s registration under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the Department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). He submits, his client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order. 2. We reproduce below paragraph-2 from said order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra). "2. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law." Likewise direction is made in this writ petition. Petitioner gets the relief in the interest of revenue. 3. The writ petition is disposed of. (Harish Tandon) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge Laxmikant Designation: SENIOR STENOGRAPHER