Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010116782026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2117/2026 ON THE DEATH OF THE SOLE APPELLANT, SRI AMULYA CHANDRA DAS, HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES NIRUPAMA DAS W/O LATE AMULYA CHANDRA DAS, RESIDENTS OF HOUSE NO.101, GANESHGURI CHARIALI, P.O. ASSAM SACHIVHALYA, P.S. DISPUR, DISTRICT- KAMRUPM, ASSAM 2: MRS CHITA RANI DAS THAKURIA D/O LATE AMULYA CHANDRA DAS W/O- BIJANLAL THAKURIA RESIDENT OF PROFESSOR COLONEY GALIAHATI BARPETA DISTRICT- BARPETA ASSAM 3: MRS PRITI LATA DAS D/O LATE AMULYA CHANDRA DAS W/O- PABAN DEKA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND P.O. SAMAGURI DISTRICT- NAGAON ASSAM 4: MRS BARNALI DAS D/O LATE AMULYA CHANDRA DAS W/O- ARUP DUTTA RESIDENT OF GANESHGURI CHARIALI KACHARIBASTI RAJABARI PATH DISTRICTKAMRUPM ASSAM 5: MISS MRIGANGEE DAS D/O LATE AMULYA CHANDRA DAS RESIDENTS OF HOUSE NO.101 GANESHGURI CHARIALI P.O. ASSAM SACHIVHALYA Page No.# 2/3 P.S. DISPUR DISTRICT- KAMRUPM ASSA VERSUS RUKSANA BEGUM W/O- LATE MD. MOSLEM UDDIN AHMED, 2:ON THE DEATH OF THE DECEASED RESPONDENT NO2 MD. MOSLEM UDDIN AHMED HIS LEGAL HEIRS/REPRESENTATIVES 2.1:JAVED MUSTAFA AHMED S/O- LATE MD. MOSLEM UDDIN AHMED 2.2:ABDULLA AHMED S/O-LATE MD. MOSLEM UDDIN AHMED 2.3:MISBAH AHMED S/O- LATE MD. MOSLEM UDDIN AHMED ALL ARE RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.8 LAIMATI GANDHI BASTI SILPUKHURI GUWAHATI781003 DISTRICT- KAMRUPM ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N HAQUE, MR A K AZAD,MR. M HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : MR Z MUKIT, Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 28.08.2026 Heard Mr. N. Haque, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A Sattar, learned senior counsel, appearing for the respondents. In the connected RSA 155/2011, the respondent no. 2 expired. Therefore, this application has been filed under Order XXII Rule 4 of the CPC for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased respondent no. 2. Prayer is allowed. The names of the legal heirs of the deceased respondent no. 2, whose names are mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application, shall be impleaded in the title page of the memo of appeal. On the other hand, Mr. Sattar is ready to represent the legal heirs of the deceased respondent no. 2 and, therefore, he prays for time to file vakalatnama on their behalf. Prayer of Mr. Sattar is also allowed. With the above, the present interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant