Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13234 (DEL)

MAMTA RANI v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

CRL.M.C./5164/2026 · 2026-07-24

Manoj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.M.C. 5164/2026 & CRL.M.C. 5183/2026 1 $~90 & 92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5164/2026 & CRL.M.A. 21693/2026 MAMTA RANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri and Mr. Saurabh Soni, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: ASI Harbij Singh and SI Bhoop Singh. 92 + CRL.M.C. 5183/2026 & CRL.M.A. 21769/2026 JAGDISH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri and Mr. Saurabh Soni, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajkumar, APP for State with ASI Harbij Singh and SI Bhoop Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 24.07.2026 CRL.M.A. 21692/2026 in (CRL.M.C. 5164/2026) & CRL.M.A. 21768/2026 in (CRL.M.C. 5183/2026 ) (for exemption) Exemption allowed, Subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5164/2026 & CRL.M.A. 21693/2026 CRL.M.C. 5183/2026 & CRL.M.A. 21769/2026 1. After hearing some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, without prejudice to the rights and contentions, does not press the present This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/07/2026 at 15:12:16 CRL.M.C. 5164/2026 & CRL.M.C. 5183/2026 2 petition. He, however, seeks liberty to raise all the contentions taken in the present petitions before the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage. He reiterates the fact that the allegations are omnibus and non-specific and therefore, as per judicial precedents, the charges cannot be framed. 2. Be that as it may, in view of the above, both the petitions are hereby disposed of, as not pressed. 3. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. 4. Since petitioner-Mamta Rani is, reportedly, 75 years of age, she would be permitted to seek exemption from her personal appearance, if she files an affidavit before the learned Trial Court that she would not dispute her identity and on all dates, she would be duly represented by her counsel. 5. A copy of the order be sent to the learned Trial Court for information. MANOJ JAIN, J JULY 24, 2026/nr/sk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/07/2026 at 15:12:16