RAJU UTTAM GAIKWAD v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
WP/6725/2025 · 2026-09-29
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13234 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13234 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
44 - WP-19308-2024.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition NO. 19308 OF 2024 Atul Digambar Kelkar ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secrtary Social Justice And Special Assistant And Ors ...Respondent WITH Writ Petition NO. 6725 OF 2025 Raju Uttam Gaikwad ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary And Ors ...Respondent
WITH Writ Petition NO. 19363 OF 2024 Prakash Tukaram Pingane ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharahstra Thr Its Secretary Social Justice And Spcial Assit Dept. And Ors ...Respondent _______ None for Petitioners. T. R. Yadav i/by R. V. Paranjape, Advocates for Respondent No. 5 in all the above Petitions. S. C. Naidu, Advocate i/by C. R. Naidu and Co. for Respondent No. 6 in WP/19308/2024 and WP/19363/2024. Ms. Deepali Kamble, Advocate for Respondent No. 6 in WP/6725/2025. Mr. V. R. Raje, AGP for State in WP/19308/2024. Mr. P. V. Nelson Rajan, AGP for State in WP/6725/2025. Smt. M. S. Srivastav, AGP for State in WP/19363/2024. Mane JYOTI RAJESH MANE Digitally signed by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2026.10.01 11:07:50 +0530
44 - WP-19308-2024.DOC _______ CORAM:
AARTI SATHE, J. DATE:
29th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.
1. None appears for the Petitioners.
2. It appears that due to passage of time Petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the aforesaid Writ Petitions, hence dismissed for want of prosecution.
(AARTI SATHE, J.) Mane