MD JAMIL ANSARI ALLIAS RAJU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3884/2026 · 2026-05-11
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13230 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13230 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:14221] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3884 of 2026
------ Md. Jamil Ansari @ Raju, aged about – 29 yrs, S/o. Md. Sabir Ansari, R/o H. Road, Muslim Bustee, Adityapur, P.O. + P.S.- Adityapur, Dist: Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-11-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gamharia P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 358 of 2025 (S.T. Case No. 108 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 238(A), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, has committed the murder of the father of the informant namely Afsar Ali and caused disappearance of the evidence of his murder. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused person namely Abdul Kareem. It is also submitted that the sole witness of the case so far examined, has turned hostile and has not supported the case of the prosecution and even after leading questions were put to him, still he has not supported the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.03.2025 as is evident from para-5 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the
petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Seraikella in connection with Gamharia P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 358 of 2025 (S.T. Case No. 108 of 2025) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 11.05.2026 Saroj/