Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13228 (JHR)

SHEKHAR SINGH @ SHEKHAR SUMAN SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2440/2026 · 2026-05-12

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:14420 ] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2440 of 2026 Shekhar Singh @ Shekhar Suman Singh, aged about 27 years, son of Sri Lal Babu Singh, resident of Qr. No. A- 5, D.G. Colony Nunudih, PO and PS Patherdih, District Dhanbad. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate. : Mr. Nishant Kumar Roy, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 12.05.2026 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 432 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 316(2) and 318(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 3. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner has moved before this court in A.B.A. No. 1260 of 2026, which was dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to move before the learned court on the strength of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Versus Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. He next submits that the petitioner has filed the surrender petition before the learned court, however, the same has been rejected, as the petitioner has not appeared at the time of call. He further submits that in view of that the present anticipatory bail petition [ 2026:JHHC:14420 ] -2- has been filed. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner has not appeared on the call before the learned court after filing of the surrender petition and in view of that the learned court has rightly rejected the said petition. 5. The earlier petition has already been dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to move before the learned court on the on the strength of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Versus Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 and further the petitioner has also filed his surrender petition, however, the petitioner has not appeared on the repeated calls, in view of that the said petition has been rejected. 6. In view of the above, it transpires that there is no new ground to entertain this petition, as such, this petition is dismissed. 7. It is open for the petitioner to comply the observations made in A.B.A. No. 1260 of 2026. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-12.05.2026 Amitesh/-